ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the feasibility of performing percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) in patients who had undergone partial gastrectomy and to evaluate factors associated with technical success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients after partial gastrectomy, who were referred for PRG between April 2006 and April 2012, were retrospectively analyzed. The remnant stomach was punctured using a 21-gauge Chiba-needle. A single anchor was used for the gastropexy and a 12-Fr or 14-Fr gastrostomy tube was inserted. Data were collected regarding the technical success, procedure time, and presence of any complications. Univariable analyses were performed to determine the factors related to the technical success. RESULTS: Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy was technically successful in 10 patients (53%), while a failed attempt and failure without an attempt were observed in 5 (26%) and 4 (21%) patients, respectively. Percutaneous radiologic jejunostomy was successfully performed in 9 patients who experienced technical failure. In the 10 successful PRG cases, the mean procedure time was 6.35 minutes. Major complications occurred in 2 patients, tube passage through the liver and pneumoperitonum in one and severe hemorrhage in the other. The technical success rate was higher in patients with Billroth I gastrectomy (100%, 6/6) than in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy (31%, 4/13) (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy can be successfully performed using the one-anchor technique in approximately half of the patients after partial gastrectomy.
Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Analysis of Variance , Feasibility Studies , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastric Stump , Gastrostomy/instrumentation , Jejunostomy/methods , Operative Time , Punctures/methods , Radiography, Interventional , Retrospective Studies , Suture Anchors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a serious complication that sometimes occurs after percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG). We evaluated the incidence of bleeding complications after a PRG and its management including transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 574 patients who underwent PRG in our institution between 2000 and 2010. Eight patients (1.4%) had symptoms or signs of upper GI bleeding after PRG. RESULTS: The initial presentation was hematemesis (n = 3), melena (n = 2), hematochezia (n = 2) and bloody drainage through the gastrostomy tube (n = 1). The time interval between PRG placement and detection of bleeding ranged from immediately after to 3 days later (mean: 28 hours). The mean decrease in hemoglobin concentration was 3.69 g/dL (range, 0.9 to 6.8 g/dL). In three patients, bleeding was controlled by transfusion (n = 2) or compression of the gastrostomy site (n = 1). The remaining five patients underwent an angiography because bleeding could not be controlled by transfusion only. In one patient, the bleeding focus was not evident on angiography or endoscopy, and wedge resection including the tube insertion site was performed for hemostasis. The other four patients underwent prophylactic (n = 1) or therapeutic (n = 3) TAEs. In three patients, successful hemostasis was achieved by TAE, whereas the remaining one patient underwent exploration due to persistent bleeding despite TAE. CONCLUSION: We observed an incidence of upper GI bleeding complicating the PRG of 1.4%. TAE following conservative management appears to be safe and effective for hemostasis.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrostomy , Incidence , Postoperative Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) is an enteral nutritional method that can be applied to a patient with dysphagia due to cerebrovascular accident, Parkinsonism, dementia, or head and neck cancer. PRG is a safe and cost-effective method with low morbidity and mortality rates compared with surgical gastrostomy, because it require less sedation and less invasive placement technique. PRG complications include wound infections, peritonitis, tube malfunctions, peristomal leakage, bleeding, ileus, pneumoperitoneum, aspiration pneumonia, and bowel perforation. But, bowel perforation after PRG is rare. We recently experienced a case of transverse colon penetration and tube displacement, which occurred as a PRG complication in a 60-year-old male with a cerebrovascular accident.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Colon, Transverse , Deglutition Disorders , Dementia , Displacement, Psychological , Gastrostomy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Hemorrhage , Ileus , Parkinsonian Disorders , Peritonitis , Pneumonia, Aspiration , Pneumoperitoneum , Stroke , Wound InfectionABSTRACT
Since being introduced by Gauderer et al. in 1980, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has proved to be a safe and effective procedure that has become a popular way to establish long term enteral feeding in situations where oral intake is not possible. Indications of PEG are broad, with a few exceptions such as total obstruction of pharynx or esophagus and poor transillumination conditions. In those cases, percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) or surgical gastrostomy is feasible. We reported a case of percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) in locked-in syndrome patient.